
Marjorie Cuerdo. (2022). Fail and Retry: How Challenge Design in Platformer Games Relates to Player Experience and Traits" Master of Science Thesis. UC Santa Cruz.
Marjorie Cuerdo, Anika Mahajan, and Edward Melcer. (2021). “Die-r Consequences: Player Experience and the Design of Failure through Respawning Mechanics". In 2021 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG). IEEE.Marjorie Cuerdo and Edward Melcer. (2020). “’I’ll Be Back’: A Taxonomy of Death and Rebirth in Platformer Video Games”. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI '20, Honolulu, HI, USA. ACM.
Edward F. Melcer and Marjorie Cuerdo. (2020). “Death & Rebirth in Platformer Games”. In Game User Experience and Player-Centered Design. Springer.
Multiplayer gaming research has most often been examined from a prosocial perspective due to its benefits in encouraging cooperative behaviors. Apart from online toxicity research, negatively-valenced dynamics are less studied. To explore these types of multiplayer experiences, we conducted an exploratory survey through the lens of what players considered "emotionally challenging" in their gaming experiences relating to the game's social, narrative, and difficulty elements. We discovered interaction patterns in recounted multiplayer experiences that we named prosocial and anti-social dynamics. We also found that it was common for multiplayer experiences to inspire reflection on one's decisions, skill level, playstyles, and relationships. We also found support for tandem play experiences. We argue that these findings reveal venues for further research into those topics to expand our knowledge on social-emotional challenges in multiplayer experiences.
Emotional challenge contrasts with the common perspective of
challenge in games. The latter focuses on performance, while the
former focuses on presenting players with heavy themes that induce
complex emotions. To explore how emotional challenge impacts the
player experience, we examined the relationship between player
reflection and affective game design patterns—conducting a sur-
vey with 53 respondents that prompted recalling an emotionally
challenging situation in a video game. We then scored perceived
emotional challenge ratings and coded the responses according to
referenced affective game design patterns to categorize levels of
reflection achieved. We found a significant difference (p < 0.011) in
emotional challenge ratings and mean ranks increased across the
five reflection groups, from lowest reflective level (non-reflective
description) to highest (critical reflection). This demonstrates that
the more emotionally challenged participants felt, the greater the
depth of their reflection was. We also discovered the following
design patterns to be prominently referenced in respective reflec-
tion levels: emotional decision-making, identification, and nega-
tive/uncomfortable feelings such as guilt.
The tension and drama of player challenges are what drives gameplay. While players
often only think about performance when they experience difficulty and failure in
games, my work argues that the scope of challenge goes beyond that aspect, including
more socioemotional eudaimonic gaming experiences.
I first explored micro and macro views of challenge and failure in games from the
performative challenge aspect, as well as how they related to player experience
outcomes. I then explored how emotional design patterns related to eudaimonic
experiences, such as player reflection. Lastly, I explored how the addition of sociality
affects the emotionally challenging player experience.
Through my explorations, this dissertation provides a definition of challenge itself that
aims to be more player-centric and inclusive of different types of challenge. Secondly, I
contribute some future research directions and recommendations towards how to
design for challenging player experiences that are emotionally-impactful and
memorable.